The FCC is currently mulling over whether to give its stamp of approval to two huge mergers — Comcast/Time Warner Cable and AT&T/DirecTV — and is intending to make public information about the deals that that these pay-TV giants make with broadcasters. But even though you and every other cable subscriber wants to know exactly how much Comcast pays for access to channels like ESPN, MTV, and the major networks, the broadcasters want that info kept under lock and key — and they’ve asked the court to stop it from made available.
Against the broadcasters’ protests, the FCC commissioners said earlier this week [PDF] that third parties would be able to review certain confidential information about programming deals between the broadcasters and pay-TV operators. This information would not be made available online (at least by the FCC) but only viewable in person at FCC headquarters and other “secure sites.”
“It is our considered judgment that permitting access to Confidential Information and Highly Confidential Information under the terms of the Amended Modified Joint Protective Orders will aid the Commission in the expeditious resolution of these proceedings,” explains the FCC.
The notion is that parties who are submitting comments and responses to these mergers should have access to this data in order to make informed statements about the market power that a combined Comcast/TWC or AT&T/DirecTV would have.
In an effort to stop these documents from going public, the broadcasters — CBS, Disney, Fox, Time Warner, Viacom, Univision — filed an emergency motion [PDF] for a stay with a federal appeals court in D.C.
“There is no dispute that these materials contain highly sensitive information that, if disclosed, will cause substantial competitive and public interest harms,” reads the motion. “The FCC historically has afforded the highest level of confidentiality protection to these materials.”
The petitioners claim that the FCC’s decision “reflects an agency that disregarded past practice, precedent,” and the rights of the broadcasters.
According to the broadcasters, even if a court ultimately decides that the documents should be made available, the FCC order should be stayed because you can’t take back that confidential information once it’s been made public.
“The harm from disclosure is so substantial and irreparable that this Court has stayed orders disclosing confidential information even when the Court ultimately upheld the disclosure decision,” reads the motion.
The broadcasters claim that the FCC order is “arbitrary and capricious” and in violation of the Trade Secrets Act.
If the court denies the broadcasters’ motion, the documents will be made available for review starting Nov. 17.
by Chris Morran via Consumerist
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario